Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-16 11:43:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BE602529295A10025C927985793C5F75AD00C3A350EAA34FA79E0C2D46AB8C46
Participant Details

Original Note:

Criticisms of the cass report are that it does not apply research methods correctly due to an over focus on RCTs despite RCTs not always being ethical, practical or the most effective method of testing: https://behavioralscientist.org/rcts-are-not-always-the-answer/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778738497928536238
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BE602529295A10025C927985793C5F75AD00C3A350EAA34FA79E0C2D46AB8C46
  • createdAtMillis - 1713267781168
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1778738497928536238BE602529295A10025C927985793C5F75AD00C3A350EAA34FA79E0C2D46AB8C46