Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-12 18:23:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A20AC8AB0F23E84C3FD9E93CEA4EA14A515B13BD681D0974F34EBCFEAB0F446C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Criticisms of the cass report are that it does not apply research methods correctly due to an over focus on RCTs despite RCTs not always being ethical, practical or the most effective method of testing: https://behavioralscientist.org/rcts-are-not-always-the-answer/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778738497928536238
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A20AC8AB0F23E84C3FD9E93CEA4EA14A515B13BD681D0974F34EBCFEAB0F446C
  • createdAtMillis - 1712946235224
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1778738497928536238A20AC8AB0F23E84C3FD9E93CEA4EA14A515B13BD681D0974F34EBCFEAB0F446C