Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-12 12:20:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0B8A848AF0695C1A4FF2FB3C98C766BDCE1E2A30858FC2EF13D8E0B46E72CC2C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Criticisms of the cass report are that it does not apply research methods correctly due to an over focus on RCTs despite RCTs not always being ethical, practical or the most effective method of testing: https://behavioralscientist.org/rcts-are-not-always-the-answer/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778738497928536238
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0B8A848AF0695C1A4FF2FB3C98C766BDCE1E2A30858FC2EF13D8E0B46E72CC2C
  • createdAtMillis - 1712924422509
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17787384979285362380B8A848AF0695C1A4FF2FB3C98C766BDCE1E2A30858FC2EF13D8E0B46E72CC2C