Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-12 07:48:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1ED721E978457A10D77A9D2457C46939C55CB5B2FB9BB3CD95518BDD33D01213
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The note not only misses key points but is actively misleading by implying that the tweet itself was part of a paid promo. The author denies this, and backs it up by blocking/removing people who try to share the account in the comments, including the girl in the photo. https://x.com/WomenBeingAwful/status/1778622932324958655

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778680254577447243
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1ED721E978457A10D77A9D2457C46939C55CB5B2FB9BB3CD95518BDD33D01213
  • createdAtMillis - 1712908093883
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17786802545774472431ED721E978457A10D77A9D2457C46939C55CB5B2FB9BB3CD95518BDD33D01213