Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-12 11:23:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A9460B3F5F13961CA57ACEF23F7BE5511F1145C801589780D01E97A5CF8C2445
Participant Details

Original Note:

This account posted image has been digitally altered or, more accurately, fabricated in order to get views for money. The people in the foreground have been cut from another image and pasted into this one, as evidenced by the mismatched shadows and noise levels. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/photography/article/digitally-manipulated-ai-altered-photo-images

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778669750165340500
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A9460B3F5F13961CA57ACEF23F7BE5511F1145C801589780D01E97A5CF8C2445
  • createdAtMillis - 1712921029224
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1778669750165340500A9460B3F5F13961CA57ACEF23F7BE5511F1145C801589780D01E97A5CF8C2445