Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-12 13:20:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9E69E853463C8396282322D3E0F37C926E11B49824AA10327E0F022FAAACEF5F
Participant Details

Original Note:

This account posted image has been digitally altered or, more accurately, fabricated in order to get views for money. The people in the foreground have been cut from another image and pasted into this one, as evidenced by the mismatched shadows and noise levels. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/photography/article/digitally-manipulated-ai-altered-photo-images

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778669750165340500
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9E69E853463C8396282322D3E0F37C926E11B49824AA10327E0F022FAAACEF5F
  • createdAtMillis - 1712928003075
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17786697501653405009E69E853463C8396282322D3E0F37C926E11B49824AA10327E0F022FAAACEF5F