Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-12 06:59:04 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7463A22C75ECC9AF7380E21121BAD45327BB58D4E5D887671A5FA7DB38123B0C
Participant Details

Original Note:

This account posted image has been digitally altered or, more accurately, fabricated in order to get views for money. The people in the foreground have been cut from another image and pasted into this one, as evidenced by the mismatched shadows and noise levels. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/photography/article/digitally-manipulated-ai-altered-photo-images

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778669750165340500
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7463A22C75ECC9AF7380E21121BAD45327BB58D4E5D887671A5FA7DB38123B0C
  • createdAtMillis - 1712905144893
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17786697501653405007463A22C75ECC9AF7380E21121BAD45327BB58D4E5D887671A5FA7DB38123B0C