Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-12 07:54:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EB7FEFB80F268ADBC1BE9EDEC01612E281EE9F4F51547DE6819AB023C34A456F
Participant Details

Original Note:

La source de la première note est importante. Mais la note laisse croire que l'employeur est dans son droit. Or la même source montre des cas similaires où l'employeur était finalement en tort.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778657829240324246
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EB7FEFB80F268ADBC1BE9EDEC01612E281EE9F4F51547DE6819AB023C34A456F
  • createdAtMillis - 1712908477515
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1778657829240324246EB7FEFB80F268ADBC1BE9EDEC01612E281EE9F4F51547DE6819AB023C34A456F