Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-12 10:54:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AF0CFD61F8492F6AC6FD67916E8D048FFBEC1975803693E1E4EE080CFC6804B0
Participant Details

Original Note:

La source de la première note est importante. Mais la note laisse croire que l'employeur est dans son droit. Or la même source montre des cas similaires où l'employeur était finalement en tort.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778657829240324246
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AF0CFD61F8492F6AC6FD67916E8D048FFBEC1975803693E1E4EE080CFC6804B0
  • createdAtMillis - 1712919262601
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1778657829240324246AF0CFD61F8492F6AC6FD67916E8D048FFBEC1975803693E1E4EE080CFC6804B0