Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-12 10:59:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 432FE8FA8BC88F3ED3721C1ACA409C7E3ADE4D29809FD51B5AD040B65A27340F
Participant Details

Original Note:

La source de la première note est importante. Mais la note laisse croire que l'employeur est dans son droit. Or la même source montre des cas similaires où l'employeur était finalement en tort.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778657829240324246
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 432FE8FA8BC88F3ED3721C1ACA409C7E3ADE4D29809FD51B5AD040B65A27340F
  • createdAtMillis - 1712919558378
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1778657829240324246432FE8FA8BC88F3ED3721C1ACA409C7E3ADE4D29809FD51B5AD040B65A27340F