Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-12 18:47:40 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1B6AC0F6D62C81D50A023C21B2D4CB5C963492A6BFA649C9144C4DD913B18A22
Participant Details

Original Note:

La source de la première note est importante. Mais la note laisse croire que l'employeur est dans son droit. Or la même source montre des cas similaires où l'employeur était finalement en tort.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778657829240324246
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1B6AC0F6D62C81D50A023C21B2D4CB5C963492A6BFA649C9144C4DD913B18A22
  • createdAtMillis - 1712947660316
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17786578292403242461B6AC0F6D62C81D50A023C21B2D4CB5C963492A6BFA649C9144C4DD913B18A22