Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-12 07:04:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0F41E1489AD88B1DA67D42EE03E3576CBC07841A9DAB5F12615ECFC490C2BE86
Participant Details

Original Note:

La source de la première note est importante. Mais la note laisse croire que l'employeur est dans son droit. Or la même source montre des cas similaires où l'employeur était finalement en tort.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778657829240324246
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0F41E1489AD88B1DA67D42EE03E3576CBC07841A9DAB5F12615ECFC490C2BE86
  • createdAtMillis - 1712905460286
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17786578292403242460F41E1489AD88B1DA67D42EE03E3576CBC07841A9DAB5F12615ECFC490C2BE86