Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-15 22:02:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C46E3356D0746CAD5AC075F443579D61C8E0CDA6076347C72DE4C99D02941114
Participant Details

Original Note:

It is not correct to say that Cass ‘totally discounted evidence from trans people from the basis of knowledge or lived experience’. Appendix 3 of the report contains ‘narrative accounts of gender questioning’. https://cass.independent-review.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/CassReview_Final.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778653707392930057
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C46E3356D0746CAD5AC075F443579D61C8E0CDA6076347C72DE4C99D02941114
  • createdAtMillis - 1723759361299
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1778653707392930057C46E3356D0746CAD5AC075F443579D61C8E0CDA6076347C72DE4C99D02941114