Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-16 17:51:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 340816843107F84129834B4D2E83C8FC21E1629F074BCB9167048725A26D76D9
Participant Details

Original Note:

It is not correct to say that Cass ‘totally discounted evidence from trans people from the basis of knowledge or lived experience’. Appendix 3 of the report contains ‘narrative accounts of gender questioning’. https://cass.independent-review.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/CassReview_Final.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778653707392930057
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 340816843107F84129834B4D2E83C8FC21E1629F074BCB9167048725A26D76D9
  • createdAtMillis - 1713289884604
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1778653707392930057340816843107F84129834B4D2E83C8FC21E1629F074BCB9167048725A26D76D9