Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-16 15:55:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FD1290D5F1259C28318A8EA603DE03C36713EAF4B8A4F5DCAA938D07A0BBD06F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - not only is the above post an opinion, not only can you not cite the paper itself to prove its own reliability, but the Cass Report was demonstrably written with bizarrely high standards for any evidence that didn't conform to the authors' beliefs and conclusions.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778501111361495065
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FD1290D5F1259C28318A8EA603DE03C36713EAF4B8A4F5DCAA938D07A0BBD06F
  • createdAtMillis - 1713282925067
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1778501111361495065FD1290D5F1259C28318A8EA603DE03C36713EAF4B8A4F5DCAA938D07A0BBD06F