Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-11 22:59:42 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CD3237742654A466605CA094498FD46DBF944B7D2780617A9A4185DC2800F9DF
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - not only is the above post an opinion, not only can you not cite the paper itself to prove its own reliability, but the Cass Report was demonstrably written with bizarrely high standards for any evidence that didn't conform to the authors' beliefs and conclusions.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778501111361495065
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CD3237742654A466605CA094498FD46DBF944B7D2780617A9A4185DC2800F9DF
  • createdAtMillis - 1712876382687
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1778501111361495065CD3237742654A466605CA094498FD46DBF944B7D2780617A9A4185DC2800F9DF