Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-15 23:43:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 73F190AB562BAAD87715E36511D3F80D4E2ED48787839E2A479CEA69055174D3
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - not only is the above post an opinion, not only can you not cite the paper itself to prove its own reliability, but the Cass Report was demonstrably written with bizarrely high standards for any evidence that didn't conform to the authors' beliefs and conclusions.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778501111361495065
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 73F190AB562BAAD87715E36511D3F80D4E2ED48787839E2A479CEA69055174D3
  • createdAtMillis - 1713224601887
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177850111136149506573F190AB562BAAD87715E36511D3F80D4E2ED48787839E2A479CEA69055174D3