Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-11 23:26:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3E8409710391E5AF9D4765FB49995766E8A5A9027CA8AB84E1892E610C4A5976
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - not only is the above post an opinion, not only can you not cite the paper itself to prove its own reliability, but the Cass Report was demonstrably written with bizarrely high standards for any evidence that didn't conform to the authors' beliefs and conclusions.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778501111361495065
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3E8409710391E5AF9D4765FB49995766E8A5A9027CA8AB84E1892E610C4A5976
  • createdAtMillis - 1712877999112
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17785011113614950653E8409710391E5AF9D4765FB49995766E8A5A9027CA8AB84E1892E610C4A5976