Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-11 21:15:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 86D38FEBF1476B91DE0257B70BD81C88B245E5A5DA65446424DC4F517F8A1A32
Participant Details

Original Note:

La note fait une affirmation fausse, tout comme la source fournie qui n'est qu'un post n'apportant aucune source. La cour de cassassion a donné de multiples motifs : https://demarchesadministratives.fr/actualites/elle-ecrit-des-propos-racistes-par-mail-la-cour-de-cassation-invalide-son-licenciement Par ailleurs, le post exprime une opinion personnelle.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778495538037416201
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 86D38FEBF1476B91DE0257B70BD81C88B245E5A5DA65446424DC4F517F8A1A32
  • createdAtMillis - 1712870146487
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177849553803741620186D38FEBF1476B91DE0257B70BD81C88B245E5A5DA65446424DC4F517F8A1A32