Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-11 18:40:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 950B88C0908090C45124213D61BE79E328CCB68BA5D5130EBA7D254F508BC631
Participant Details

Original Note:

The quoted tweet contains an ambiguous sentence, but it's clear that Ms. Rowling was suggesting that the person set *their opinion* on fire, not themselves. Even in the most uncharitable interpretation, the person could quench their arse in a barrel of water. https://libguides.newcastle.edu.au/foundation-studies/feedback/ambiguous

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778490708279620095
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 950B88C0908090C45124213D61BE79E328CCB68BA5D5130EBA7D254F508BC631
  • createdAtMillis - 1712860804258
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1778490708279620095950B88C0908090C45124213D61BE79E328CCB68BA5D5130EBA7D254F508BC631