Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-16 17:43:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6789612B57927DC938EEEB2FBE694A2CF2F138058B84F694F60C3670582A617B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Cass report is widely recognised as being a balanced well researched piece, focussing on GIDS issues including long waiting times. It encompasses numerous studies, systematic reviews and research. https://cass.independent-review.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/CassReview_Final.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778468032622342377
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6789612B57927DC938EEEB2FBE694A2CF2F138058B84F694F60C3670582A617B
  • createdAtMillis - 1713289424859
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17784680326223423776789612B57927DC938EEEB2FBE694A2CF2F138058B84F694F60C3670582A617B