Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-11 17:32:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 186DE77D82BA68936662284DCFFB4870676EBC289E40E99C37FBF4A98B3FC78D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Lula foi condenado com ampla quantidade de provas. Essas provas não foram refutadas. O que houve foi a anulação do processo por questão técnica. https://g1.globo.com/politica/noticia/condenacao-de-lula-veja-as-provas-que-basearam-a-sentenca-de-moro.ghtml https://epoca.oglobo.globo.com/politica/noticia/2017/05/provas-contra-lula-3-mil-evidencias-13-casos-e-r-80-milhoes-em-propina.html https://www.poder360.com.br/justica/lula-se-livra-de-processos-mas-teve-so-3-absolvicoes/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778467521521226029
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 186DE77D82BA68936662284DCFFB4870676EBC289E40E99C37FBF4A98B3FC78D
  • createdAtMillis - 1712856778818
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1778467521521226029186DE77D82BA68936662284DCFFB4870676EBC289E40E99C37FBF4A98B3FC78D