Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-12 09:37:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8E7A3FA6DFD49EC21DCB543E57C944E1330E5DD2E574B9D665E2E80E74933D69
Participant Details

Original Note:

裁判所での個別事例の判断基準があいまいのままであり、「子の利益」との関連も不明確である https://www.jlaf.jp/kyoiku/2024/0409_1727.html 共同親権のメリットとデメリット https://www.riconhiroba.com/children/joint-custody.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778445916380475490
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8E7A3FA6DFD49EC21DCB543E57C944E1330E5DD2E574B9D665E2E80E74933D69
  • createdAtMillis - 1712914627779
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17784459163804754908E7A3FA6DFD49EC21DCB543E57C944E1330E5DD2E574B9D665E2E80E74933D69