Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-11 09:45:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CAC45AB984215B50B4B2ADD6E6E54608F92389036F5B4D90E108EC685921AD1C
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a misrepresentation by the poster of a simple, illustrative example in the Cass Report, which considered the different behaviours of the two discreet human sexes and pointed out they’re not the result of social influences alone, but also biological differences. https://cass.independent-review.uk/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778330482611978385
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CAC45AB984215B50B4B2ADD6E6E54608F92389036F5B4D90E108EC685921AD1C
  • createdAtMillis - 1712828714194
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1778330482611978385CAC45AB984215B50B4B2ADD6E6E54608F92389036F5B4D90E108EC685921AD1C