Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-11 11:56:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B6C0023A6E59275A55035CD26B758B50F8D77FD094D458ADACA5E9D34B369054
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a misrepresentation by the poster of a simple, illustrative example in the Cass Report, which considered the different behaviours of the two discreet human sexes and pointed out they’re not the result of social influences alone, but also biological differences. https://cass.independent-review.uk/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778330482611978385
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B6C0023A6E59275A55035CD26B758B50F8D77FD094D458ADACA5E9D34B369054
  • createdAtMillis - 1712836581865
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1778330482611978385B6C0023A6E59275A55035CD26B758B50F8D77FD094D458ADACA5E9D34B369054