Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-13 03:35:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5199D0BE585C1106B711260E8EF04683479C0D57337E5C5ED433E6F72097D6E0
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a misrepresentation by the poster of a simple, illustrative example in the Cass Report, which considered the different behaviours of the two discreet human sexes and pointed out they’re not the result of social influences alone, but also biological differences. https://cass.independent-review.uk/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778330482611978385
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5199D0BE585C1106B711260E8EF04683479C0D57337E5C5ED433E6F72097D6E0
  • createdAtMillis - 1712979332540
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17783304826119783855199D0BE585C1106B711260E8EF04683479C0D57337E5C5ED433E6F72097D6E0