Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-11 10:34:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2D7FFE3B3E2EAED047E6CEC3AA19E46E014EABAE23F090A9CC7D6BB37E814488
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a misrepresentation by the poster of a simple, illustrative example in the Cass Report, which considered the different behaviours of the two discreet human sexes and pointed out they’re not the result of social influences alone, but also biological differences. https://cass.independent-review.uk/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778330482611978385
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2D7FFE3B3E2EAED047E6CEC3AA19E46E014EABAE23F090A9CC7D6BB37E814488
  • createdAtMillis - 1712831661892
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17783304826119783852D7FFE3B3E2EAED047E6CEC3AA19E46E014EABAE23F090A9CC7D6BB37E814488