Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-11 19:52:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 158CD21A4C67B9A074871E844E8121A4B66EBF058EDE1482E696368A807CF5F4
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is a misrepresentation by the poster of a simple, illustrative example in the Cass Report, which considered the different behaviours of the two discreet human sexes and pointed out they’re not the result of social influences alone, but also biological differences. https://cass.independent-review.uk/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778330482611978385
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 158CD21A4C67B9A074871E844E8121A4B66EBF058EDE1482E696368A807CF5F4
  • createdAtMillis - 1712865132454
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1778330482611978385158CD21A4C67B9A074871E844E8121A4B66EBF058EDE1482E696368A807CF5F4