Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-11 17:03:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F7AF16C56532DCAF6A2F2FB7CD9AEC893669FE30AB88D88D753AFB73EB8C1DCA
Participant Details

Original Note:

The preceding para (6.8), and the footnote to the graph, make it explicit that height "is included to provide a familiar comparator for contextualising the sizes of the behavioural/psychological sex differences". https://cass.independent-review.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/CassReview_Final.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778330224825954386
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F7AF16C56532DCAF6A2F2FB7CD9AEC893669FE30AB88D88D753AFB73EB8C1DCA
  • createdAtMillis - 1712855011281
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1778330224825954386F7AF16C56532DCAF6A2F2FB7CD9AEC893669FE30AB88D88D753AFB73EB8C1DCA