Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-11 10:04:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F79361764E6A89DC0285ACC885EB883FC7DC18E79C9FFFC22742061E295D71A1
Participant Details

Original Note:

The preceding para (6.8), and the footnote to the graph, make it explicit that height "is included to provide a familiar comparator for contextualising the sizes of the behavioural/psychological sex differences". https://cass.independent-review.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/CassReview_Final.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778330224825954386
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F79361764E6A89DC0285ACC885EB883FC7DC18E79C9FFFC22742061E295D71A1
  • createdAtMillis - 1712829881128
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1778330224825954386F79361764E6A89DC0285ACC885EB883FC7DC18E79C9FFFC22742061E295D71A1