Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-11 14:38:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DBA0F0AED86B127A899C025E741FF7116E936EE1105D047E2F6046B2482361BD
Participant Details

Original Note:

The preceding para (6.8), and the footnote to the graph, make it explicit that height "is included to provide a familiar comparator for contextualising the sizes of the behavioural/psychological sex differences". https://cass.independent-review.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/CassReview_Final.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778330224825954386
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DBA0F0AED86B127A899C025E741FF7116E936EE1105D047E2F6046B2482361BD
  • createdAtMillis - 1712846318347
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1778330224825954386DBA0F0AED86B127A899C025E741FF7116E936EE1105D047E2F6046B2482361BD