Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-15 11:05:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A11A79FB953F7392A8A17DB75DFC4EB7F87291C150F56F74CDCC27C403E1E372
Participant Details

Original Note:

このポストの前半は「公園は憩いの場であるべき」という個人的な感想を表明したもので、過去の宮下公園がどのような状態であったかには関係ありません。よって、誤解を招くポストではなく、コミュニティノートは不要です。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778262866866712808
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A11A79FB953F7392A8A17DB75DFC4EB7F87291C150F56F74CDCC27C403E1E372
  • createdAtMillis - 1713179101303
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1778262866866712808A11A79FB953F7392A8A17DB75DFC4EB7F87291C150F56F74CDCC27C403E1E372