Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-11 09:38:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 383CCD607D9127EBFB5F5FB8A0B5E5F3768061D3379E37A1B3430A22BB7D6F4D
Participant Details

Original Note:

このポストの前半は「公園は憩いの場であるべき」という個人的な感想を表明したもので、過去の宮下公園がどのような状態であったかには関係ありません。よって、誤解を招くポストではなく、コミュニティノートは不要です。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778262866866712808
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 383CCD607D9127EBFB5F5FB8A0B5E5F3768061D3379E37A1B3430A22BB7D6F4D
  • createdAtMillis - 1712828334100
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1778262866866712808383CCD607D9127EBFB5F5FB8A0B5E5F3768061D3379E37A1B3430A22BB7D6F4D