Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-11 03:08:14 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1824649A73E6827415928ABD72647A6D89C349F85C5BD0E6CD70FA8112718EC8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Post is personal opinion referring to the lack of citations for claims, flawed methodology used to discredit studies and bias in language used. It is not claiming that the entire review is fiction, but that it is highly flawed which is a valid opinion and not worthy of a note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778245111937487232
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1824649A73E6827415928ABD72647A6D89C349F85C5BD0E6CD70FA8112718EC8
  • createdAtMillis - 1712804894371
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17782451119374872321824649A73E6827415928ABD72647A6D89C349F85C5BD0E6CD70FA8112718EC8