Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-11 11:18:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DD2C37C9346307DE06F807BFC0BF79E43A6FDDBDC7E334A6D5444815380D69CA
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Cass Review sources include 179 peer-reviewed papers, data from 15 clinics in 8 countries, guidelines for 23 clinics, data on 113,269 patients & 1000+ individuals interviewed. Critics cannot agree how many papers they think were rejected. https://cass.independent-review.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/CassReview_Final.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778216800934613320
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DD2C37C9346307DE06F807BFC0BF79E43A6FDDBDC7E334A6D5444815380D69CA
  • createdAtMillis - 1712834327888
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1778216800934613320DD2C37C9346307DE06F807BFC0BF79E43A6FDDBDC7E334A6D5444815380D69CA