Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-11 11:35:26 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B0D9AC9E70D6BBD1F902D6547B321EE2B482F4CC3B6F84DD2466AAF2FA0D3717
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN A peer reviewed study supports the opinion expressed in the post, which is clearly not an expression of fact either. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/26895269.2024.2328249 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/26895269.2024.2328249

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778210911267803293
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B0D9AC9E70D6BBD1F902D6547B321EE2B482F4CC3B6F84DD2466AAF2FA0D3717
  • createdAtMillis - 1712835326491
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1778210911267803293B0D9AC9E70D6BBD1F902D6547B321EE2B482F4CC3B6F84DD2466AAF2FA0D3717