Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-11 08:39:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EFEDEB9C45C8B1D1270737990F9C9F93B57FF8D20178BA4977BFE7E226A2A65B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The post does not make a claim about the methodology, it simply says concerns have been raised about the methodology, which is entirely true. Also, simply linking the report itself is not evidence that its methodology is “meticulous”, or a way to shut down any questions.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778187119200006169
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EFEDEB9C45C8B1D1270737990F9C9F93B57FF8D20178BA4977BFE7E226A2A65B
  • createdAtMillis - 1712824774080
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1778187119200006169EFEDEB9C45C8B1D1270737990F9C9F93B57FF8D20178BA4977BFE7E226A2A65B