Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-12 07:35:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1C0C9BFDE27E138484601F927673F3BB3D226F5BA3765FAA44370E63061948BC
Participant Details

Original Note:

This isn't from the Cass report and so isn't a valid criticism of it https://cass.independent-review.uk/home/publications/final-report/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778146131911778710
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1C0C9BFDE27E138484601F927673F3BB3D226F5BA3765FAA44370E63061948BC
  • createdAtMillis - 1712907321180
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17781461319117787101C0C9BFDE27E138484601F927673F3BB3D226F5BA3765FAA44370E63061948BC