Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-14 15:39:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 18158092DBDAFB5B68919EA3970988D4CF2C826EF6798C9B9F43EB583015200B
Participant Details

Original Note:

This isn't from the Cass report and so isn't a valid criticism of it https://cass.independent-review.uk/home/publications/final-report/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778146131911778710
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 18158092DBDAFB5B68919EA3970988D4CF2C826EF6798C9B9F43EB583015200B
  • createdAtMillis - 1713109155938
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177814613191177871018158092DBDAFB5B68919EA3970988D4CF2C826EF6798C9B9F43EB583015200B