Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-11 00:16:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A790633D626F646D83D69A0715CB15C0C27E1D2F3FA9322ADC1D0FB8442BADBE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Judicial review examines a decision made by central or local government or quangos to ensure it has been made correctly/fairly according to the law and basic principles of fairness. A JR can quash the decision and then the body must go and make it again, using proper processes https://www.bihr.org.uk/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778134237738107275
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A790633D626F646D83D69A0715CB15C0C27E1D2F3FA9322ADC1D0FB8442BADBE
  • createdAtMillis - 1712794577396
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1778134237738107275A790633D626F646D83D69A0715CB15C0C27E1D2F3FA9322ADC1D0FB8442BADBE