Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-10 20:14:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A0D03A960BDD4C04E9E427D24AEDD510F244DCEA7D0B7464C629F14D7C5B124A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Judicial review examines a decision made by central or local government or quangos to ensure it has been made correctly/fairly according to the law and basic principles of fairness. A JR can quash the decision and then the body must go and make it again, using proper processes https://www.bihr.org.uk/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778134237738107275
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A0D03A960BDD4C04E9E427D24AEDD510F244DCEA7D0B7464C629F14D7C5B124A
  • createdAtMillis - 1712780042187
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1778134237738107275A0D03A960BDD4C04E9E427D24AEDD510F244DCEA7D0B7464C629F14D7C5B124A