Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-11 02:14:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E217A2BAE25775CAC0C9736985E4C71C701A0C647ED1F8FBA192F2B219091D03
Participant Details

Original Note:

This post seeks to misrepresent Cass’s methodology: the team commissioned a review of evidence from NICE on the efficacy of puberty blockers which showed that the quality of the evidence for their use was very poor. https://cass.independent-review.uk/home/publications/final-report/ https://segm.org/NICE_gender_medicine_systematic_review_finds_poor_quality_evidence

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778115473931931876
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E217A2BAE25775CAC0C9736985E4C71C701A0C647ED1F8FBA192F2B219091D03
  • createdAtMillis - 1712801644294
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1778115473931931876E217A2BAE25775CAC0C9736985E4C71C701A0C647ED1F8FBA192F2B219091D03