Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-10 18:06:46 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 00620FA482F10590245F5AB58185E356C4C085277C9E319E924244F197A33341
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Please keep opinions in the comment section and avoid the use of biased language, it’s an abuse of Community notes for a “gotcha”. This post is clearly Wes’s opinion upon reading the Cass report and does not require a community note. https://cass.independent-review.uk/home/publications/final-report/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778033133775994890
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 00620FA482F10590245F5AB58185E356C4C085277C9E319E924244F197A33341
  • createdAtMillis - 1712772406459
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177803313377599489000620FA482F10590245F5AB58185E356C4C085277C9E319E924244F197A33341