Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-10 11:43:56 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D9DB0E49403FFFDC224BE8C7AE218528DAC99FA49E86376143AA574E4BC86E4F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Personal opinion, and a correct one at that. The Cass Review dismissed the overwhelming majority of existing studies.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778010249112244299
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D9DB0E49403FFFDC224BE8C7AE218528DAC99FA49E86376143AA574E4BC86E4F
  • createdAtMillis - 1712749436617
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1778010249112244299D9DB0E49403FFFDC224BE8C7AE218528DAC99FA49E86376143AA574E4BC86E4F