Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-10 14:18:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C48AF2781CF73B7E6451C4BD5E9ACF7EF3E0F6A342898080F766EB950E3B744F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The studies downgraded in the Cass Report were flagged for various reasons and none were excluded solely on the basis of not being blind. Most were assessed as; high risk of Bias, lack of control group, no randomization, loss of participants on follow-up and poor quality. https://cass.independent-review.uk/home/publications/final-report/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777981762825597178
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C48AF2781CF73B7E6451C4BD5E9ACF7EF3E0F6A342898080F766EB950E3B744F
  • createdAtMillis - 1712758703701
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1777981762825597178C48AF2781CF73B7E6451C4BD5E9ACF7EF3E0F6A342898080F766EB950E3B744F