Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-10 09:30:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A13E2F9FE49C8C0B2D5465D8294F2F12DE7956C493CFC506CDD5273EDB2084E6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Niedopuszczalne jest użycie wariografu w trakcie czynności przesłuchania" - postanowienie Sądu Najwyższego z 29 stycznia 2015 r., w sprawie o sygn. akt I KZP 25/14 http://www.sn.pl/sites/orzecznictwo/Orzeczenia3/I%20KZP%2025-14.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777961099100377097
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A13E2F9FE49C8C0B2D5465D8294F2F12DE7956C493CFC506CDD5273EDB2084E6
  • createdAtMillis - 1712741412931
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1777961099100377097A13E2F9FE49C8C0B2D5465D8294F2F12DE7956C493CFC506CDD5273EDB2084E6