Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-10 13:39:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 26D3DBCEDE6359095FC0CD1A0CDD9FA527A8CE1085D638F15D28C96630E7BC9A
Participant Details

Original Note:

This disputes part of the post that indeed seems inaccurate. But an important point of the post (74% max regulatory level) is true by your own cited source. It did, but was a California, rather than Federal limit. A superior note would add context, not dispute entirely. https://t.co/7CrWGESnqr

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777911892964433924
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 26D3DBCEDE6359095FC0CD1A0CDD9FA527A8CE1085D638F15D28C96630E7BC9A
  • createdAtMillis - 1712756371402
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177791189296443392426D3DBCEDE6359095FC0CD1A0CDD9FA527A8CE1085D638F15D28C96630E7BC9A