Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-10 18:49:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9055033527904CBD7A55052DDC09CDE283F732BEF54EB89205D2B3F5092A5697
Participant Details

Original Note:

Os documentos explanados pela autora encontram-se no link do site do Tribunal de Justiça de São Paulo usando o processo 1501381-81.2021.8.26.0050 e código 178A0834. Os documentos são oficiais e diferente do que aponta Shellenberger, não há atuação alguma do STF, e sim TJSP. https://esaj.tjsp.jus.br/pastadigital/sg/abrirConferenciaDocumento.do

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777899146080337947
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9055033527904CBD7A55052DDC09CDE283F732BEF54EB89205D2B3F5092A5697
  • createdAtMillis - 1712774990154
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17778991460803379479055033527904CBD7A55052DDC09CDE283F732BEF54EB89205D2B3F5092A5697