Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-22 13:20:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 797444CD0EDD7635F339D719AE98981A09F1FAD23409605AB9898BDC098A5D62
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The original post includes factual claims in an opinion piece. The current note does nothing to refute these claims and instead cites aged articles which were published before these recent facts came to light. The note posted is argumentative and misses the point.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777855646538281250
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 797444CD0EDD7635F339D719AE98981A09F1FAD23409605AB9898BDC098A5D62
  • createdAtMillis - 1713792015055
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1777855646538281250797444CD0EDD7635F339D719AE98981A09F1FAD23409605AB9898BDC098A5D62