Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-10 02:22:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 43DA3746E202F5AE9C533243E6B7E5EF3669F37C833C89F7E6BB7EE9A94696EA
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The original post includes factual claims in an opinion piece. The current note does nothing to refute these claims and instead cites aged articles which were published before these recent facts came to light. The note posted is argumentative and misses the point.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1777855646538281250
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 43DA3746E202F5AE9C533243E6B7E5EF3669F37C833C89F7E6BB7EE9A94696EA
  • createdAtMillis - 1712715723862
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177785564653828125043DA3746E202F5AE9C533243E6B7E5EF3669F37C833C89F7E6BB7EE9A94696EA